Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 18666 for quote.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 18666 for quote.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 700 N.W.2d 62 (quoted source omitted). The defendant must also show “[a] reasonable probability
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137519 - 2017-09-21
, 700 N.W.2d 62 (quoted source omitted). The defendant must also show “[a] reasonable probability
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137519 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
it.’” State v. Scott, 2017 WI App 40, ¶29, 376 Wis. 2d 430, 899 N.W.2d 728 (quoting State v. Payette, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
it.’” State v. Scott, 2017 WI App 40, ¶29, 376 Wis. 2d 430, 899 N.W.2d 728 (quoting State v. Payette, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
it.’” State v. Scott, 2017 WI App 40, ¶29, 376 Wis. 2d 430, 899 N.W.2d 728 (quoting State v. Payette, 2008
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
it.’” State v. Scott, 2017 WI App 40, ¶29, 376 Wis. 2d 430, 899 N.W.2d 728 (quoting State v. Payette, 2008
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
[PDF]
State v. Wilfredo Melo
and Dangerous Melo, quoting Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 91 (1979), argues that “‘mere propinquity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11060 - 2017-09-19
and Dangerous Melo, quoting Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 91 (1979), argues that “‘mere propinquity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11060 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ray Lee Wimer
. He relies on the following quote from Laxton: “Laxton does not argue that a jury is required to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4416 - 2005-03-31
. He relies on the following quote from Laxton: “Laxton does not argue that a jury is required to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4416 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas F. Kallenbach
Wis.2d at 139, 456 N.W.2d at 834 (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 21). Reasonableness is measured against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14607 - 2005-03-31
Wis.2d at 139, 456 N.W.2d at 834 (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 21). Reasonableness is measured against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14607 - 2005-03-31
Andre Moore v. Lawrence R. Stahowiak
….” Id. (quoted source omitted). Furthermore, mandamus is an exceptional remedy. It is a “remedy only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11373 - 2005-03-31
….” Id. (quoted source omitted). Furthermore, mandamus is an exceptional remedy. It is a “remedy only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11373 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a brief stop.” Id. (quoting State v. Anderson, 155 Wis. 2d 77, 84, 454 N.W.2d 763 (1990)). As our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196505 - 2017-09-21
a brief stop.” Id. (quoting State v. Anderson, 155 Wis. 2d 77, 84, 454 N.W.2d 763 (1990)). As our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196505 - 2017-09-21
William J. Dekker v. Dennis M. Wergin
. Walker, 209 Wis.2d at 79, 568 N.W.2d at 306 (quoting Travelers Indem. Co. v. Gore, 761 F.2d 1549, 1551
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692 - 2005-03-31
. Walker, 209 Wis.2d at 79, 568 N.W.2d at 306 (quoting Travelers Indem. Co. v. Gore, 761 F.2d 1549, 1551
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Izell W.
. State, 53 Wis. 2d 420, 428, 192 N.W.2d 833, 837 (1972) (quoted source omitted). State v. White, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7028 - 2017-09-20
. State, 53 Wis. 2d 420, 428, 192 N.W.2d 833, 837 (1972) (quoted source omitted). State v. White, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7028 - 2017-09-20