Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 21731 for warrants.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 21731 for warrants.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Renee failed to state a cognizable contempt claim or a substantial change in circumstances warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187470 - 2017-09-21
Renee failed to state a cognizable contempt claim or a substantial change in circumstances warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187470 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rayfe J. Paulick
and are fit for release. We do not interpret § 980.09(2)(a) as requiring more unless facts exist that warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11760 - 2005-03-31
and are fit for release. We do not interpret § 980.09(2)(a) as requiring more unless facts exist that warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11760 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Johnson
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9964 - 2005-03-31
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9964 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan R. Torres
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6099 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6099 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard T. Wittrock
no contest plea and that the plea withdrawal motion did not allege sufficient facts to warrant a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17635 - 2005-04-12
no contest plea and that the plea withdrawal motion did not allege sufficient facts to warrant a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17635 - 2005-04-12
COURT OF APPEALS
whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53317 - 2010-08-16
whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53317 - 2010-08-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supervision; he further discovered Jackson also had an active warrant for his arrest.2 The officer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636371 - 2023-03-28
supervision; he further discovered Jackson also had an active warrant for his arrest.2 The officer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636371 - 2023-03-28
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Sammie L. Glass
warrant to seek the property’s return in the circuit court for the county in which the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15972 - 2017-09-21
warrant to seek the property’s return in the circuit court for the county in which the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15972 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a warrant.2 The court denied the motions without an evidentiary hearing. This appeal follows. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251812 - 2020-01-02
to a warrant.2 The court denied the motions without an evidentiary hearing. This appeal follows. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251812 - 2020-01-02