Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 21556 for warrants.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 21556 for warrants.
[PDF]
State v. Richard T. Wittrock
to warrant a hearing. Wittrock appeals. ¶4 The circuit court has the discretion to deny a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17635 - 2017-09-21
to warrant a hearing. Wittrock appeals. ¶4 The circuit court has the discretion to deny a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17635 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jonathon R. Torres
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6100 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6100 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a postsentencing diagnosis of hypothyroidism was a new factor warranting resentencing. We reject Pruett’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85756 - 2014-09-15
that a postsentencing diagnosis of hypothyroidism was a new factor warranting resentencing. We reject Pruett’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85756 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a repeat offender. The charges were based upon materials seized pursuant to a search warrant obtained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609460 - 2023-01-10
as a repeat offender. The charges were based upon materials seized pursuant to a search warrant obtained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609460 - 2023-01-10
State v. Jonathan R. Torres
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6099 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6099 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
claim that a new factor warrants sentence modification. We affirm. No. 2010AP31-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58253 - 2014-09-15
claim that a new factor warrants sentence modification. We affirm. No. 2010AP31-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58253 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jonathan R. Torres
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31
Irving G. Wenzel v. Washburn County
the answer was not warranted by existing law nor a good faith argument for the extension, modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31
the answer was not warranted by existing law nor a good faith argument for the extension, modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31
Paul Steven Screnock v. Malyn Screnock
a substantial change of circumstances sufficient to warrant the modification of maintenance or child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31
a substantial change of circumstances sufficient to warrant the modification of maintenance or child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31
Leonard L. Jones v. State
be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment or, if incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment or, if incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31