Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 20855 for word.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 20855 for word.
State v. Phillip C. Lamson
that a defendant actually articulate the words, “I plead guilty.” Hence, he argues that “[t]he intentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10189 - 2005-03-31
that a defendant actually articulate the words, “I plead guilty.” Hence, he argues that “[t]he intentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10189 - 2005-03-31
Tracy and Damian Osterhues v. Board of Adjustment for Washburn County
of the word “appeals” is generally not considered to entitle an appellant to a trial de novo. Kuehnel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6774 - 2005-03-31
of the word “appeals” is generally not considered to entitle an appellant to a trial de novo. Kuehnel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6774 - 2005-03-31
State v. Crystal Carreon
to Roberto A., a man in the car yelled “some bad words … [l]ike, son of a bitch.” Roberto A. testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26210 - 2006-08-14
to Roberto A., a man in the car yelled “some bad words … [l]ike, son of a bitch.” Roberto A. testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26210 - 2006-08-14
[PDF]
State v. Donald Savinski
of the word “has” in both the present and past tense in the same sentence confused the jury, and (2) it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12522 - 2017-09-21
of the word “has” in both the present and past tense in the same sentence confused the jury, and (2) it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12522 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court misinterpreted the word “enforce” as used in the fee-shifting portion of the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64767 - 2014-09-15
that the circuit court misinterpreted the word “enforce” as used in the fee-shifting portion of the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64767 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the words of the statute to discover the legislature’s intent. See McEvoy v. Group Health Coop. of Eau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83708 - 2014-09-15
of the words of the statute to discover the legislature’s intent. See McEvoy v. Group Health Coop. of Eau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83708 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was not the word “help.” The relevant portion of Officer Olson’s testimony is as follows: “The reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59077 - 2011-01-19
was not the word “help.” The relevant portion of Officer Olson’s testimony is as follows: “The reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59077 - 2011-01-19
COURT OF APPEALS
construe statutes by discerning the plain meaning of the words of the statute to discover the legislature’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
construe statutes by discerning the plain meaning of the words of the statute to discover the legislature’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
of “imminent.” The parties agree that this request appears to have been for use in applying that word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42498 - 2014-09-15
of “imminent.” The parties agree that this request appears to have been for use in applying that word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42498 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert S. Martinez
you is what were the words and circumstances in which you told him that you would take his blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3173 - 2005-03-31
you is what were the words and circumstances in which you told him that you would take his blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3173 - 2005-03-31