Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 20926 for word.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 20926 for word.
Northwest Properties v. Outagamie County
. Statutes should be construed so that no word or clause will be rendered surplusage. State v. Martin, 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13397 - 2005-03-31
. Statutes should be construed so that no word or clause will be rendered surplusage. State v. Martin, 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13397 - 2005-03-31
Robert Plevin v. Department of Transportation
an analysis of the word “includes,” which immediately precedes the delineation of the three acceptable forms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5959 - 2005-03-31
an analysis of the word “includes,” which immediately precedes the delineation of the three acceptable forms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5959 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
doubt.” Id., ¶39. In other words, the test here is “whether a circuit court, acting reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76273 - 2014-09-15
doubt.” Id., ¶39. In other words, the test here is “whether a circuit court, acting reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76273 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Clarence E. Hill
on that crime. In other words, Hill wanted to give the jury a chance to either convict him of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8344 - 2017-09-19
on that crime. In other words, Hill wanted to give the jury a chance to either convict him of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8344 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a definition or further explanation of the word ‘substantial’ in count 1 element 2?” In response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216063 - 2018-07-24
a definition or further explanation of the word ‘substantial’ in count 1 element 2?” In response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216063 - 2018-07-24
State v. Phillip C. Lamson
that a defendant actually articulate the words, “I plead guilty.” Hence, he argues that “[t]he intentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10189 - 2005-03-31
that a defendant actually articulate the words, “I plead guilty.” Hence, he argues that “[t]he intentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Phillip C. Lamson
argues that § 972.13(1), STATS., requires that a defendant actually articulate the words, “I plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10189 - 2017-09-20
argues that § 972.13(1), STATS., requires that a defendant actually articulate the words, “I plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10189 - 2017-09-20
2009 WI APP 40
with this decision.” This argument ignores the words “consistent with this decision.” The ALJ’s decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35480 - 2009-03-24
with this decision.” This argument ignores the words “consistent with this decision.” The ALJ’s decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35480 - 2009-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
get beyond that. I think the word “friend” might have been used, but it differed from one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659546 - 2023-05-25
get beyond that. I think the word “friend” might have been used, but it differed from one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659546 - 2023-05-25
State v. Donald Savinski
) the use of the word “has” in both the present and past tense in the same sentence confused the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12522 - 2005-03-31
) the use of the word “has” in both the present and past tense in the same sentence confused the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12522 - 2005-03-31