Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21401 - 21410 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21401 - 21410 of 30242 for de.
wi app 129 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP474-CR Complete Tit...
will uphold a circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129017 - 2014-12-18
will uphold a circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129017 - 2014-12-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
we review de novo. See Paige K.B. v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 225, 594 N.W.2d 370 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32463 - 2014-09-15
we review de novo. See Paige K.B. v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 225, 594 N.W.2d 370 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32463 - 2014-09-15
WI App 84 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2220-CR Complete Tit...
(1g) in the context of the case law. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84153 - 2012-07-26
(1g) in the context of the case law. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84153 - 2012-07-26
[PDF]
WI APP 151
. However, we interpret statutes and review their application to undisputed facts de novo. Watton v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34120 - 2014-09-15
. However, we interpret statutes and review their application to undisputed facts de novo. Watton v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34120 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jacqee R. Anderson
de novo review. See id. at 310. If we conclude that Anderson’s motion fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15871 - 2017-09-21
de novo review. See id. at 310. If we conclude that Anderson’s motion fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15871 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Guzman
” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127-28, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990) (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15351 - 2017-09-21
” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127-28, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990) (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15351 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112167 - 2014-05-12
was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112167 - 2014-05-12
Louis Kapischke v. County of Walworth
of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd. of Supervisors, 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13771 - 2005-03-31
of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd. of Supervisors, 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13771 - 2005-03-31
Milwaukee Police Association v. Arthur Jones
that law to undisputed facts, we review the circuit court’s decision de novo. See State ex rel. Schultz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14924 - 2005-03-31
that law to undisputed facts, we review the circuit court’s decision de novo. See State ex rel. Schultz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14924 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo.” Otterstatter v. City of Watertown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214488 - 2018-06-19
“We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo.” Otterstatter v. City of Watertown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214488 - 2018-06-19