Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21411 - 21420 of 29828 for des.

2007 WI APP 263
interpretation which we review de novo. See State v. Sveum, 2002 WI App 105, ¶5, 254 Wis. 2d 868, 648 N.W.2d 496
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30978 - 2007-12-18

[PDF] NOS Communications, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
the extent of the agency’s jurisdiction and powers, which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5514 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo.” See State v. Alexander, 2013 WI 70, ¶18, 349 Wis. 2d 327, 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224562 - 2018-10-30

Carew Concrete & Supply Co., Inc. v. Town of Humboldt
not then refuse to meet the de facto standards of the ordinance even though licensing is, in general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3004 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. The interpretation and application of statutes is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35044 - 2008-12-29

2007 WI APP 148
, holding they had immunity. Rechsteiner appeals. Discussion ¶9 We review summary judgments de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29155 - 2007-06-26

COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d at 339. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02

State v. Travis J. Smith
principles is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., 229 Wis. 2d at 262–263, 600 N.W.2d at 17–18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6189 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
meet the constitutional standard, which I review de novo. ¶6 Bray claims that questioning of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236318 - 2019-02-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
standard is a question of law which we review de novo.” Ide v. LIRC, 224 Wis. 2d 159, 166, 589 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70216 - 2014-09-15