Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21411 - 21420 of 70183 for his.

COURT OF APPEALS
denying his 2010 motion for postconviction relief. None of his arguments persuade us; we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82149 - 2012-05-08

[PDF] Miguel A. Rivera v. Beth T. Vandeboom
. BACKGROUND ¶2 On July 10, 1995, Rivera, having completed his shift as a postal worker, left his workplace
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3065 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion to suppress evidence. Brink does not challenge the validity of the initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204111 - 2017-11-30

[PDF] State v. Stephen R. Hart
), STATS., and from an order denying his postconviction motion. Hart raises four issues on appeal: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8129 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - September 2016
activated his squad’s emergency lights and attempted to pull Richard L. Weber over for having a defective
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174462 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lynn E. Steiner v. Van F. Steiner
argues that the court erred when it treated his sick leave account as a consideration under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6352 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Carlson
a circuit court order finding “unreasonable” 1 his refusal to submit to a chemical test requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3875 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Frontsheet
Paul D'Arruda be declared in default, that his license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143629 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael J. Carlson
ANDERSON, J. Michael J. Carlson appeals a circuit court order finding “unreasonable”[1] his refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3875 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
and recommendation that the court declare Attorney Ricardo Perez in default and suspend his license to practice law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250289 - 2019-11-19