Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21411 - 21420 of 38489 for t's.
Search results 21411 - 21420 of 38489 for t's.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. D. T. KEDINGER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58204 - 2014-09-15
. D. T. KEDINGER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58204 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brad A. Peterson
County: DOUGLAS T. FOX, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, P.J., Myse and Hoover, JJ. PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11887 - 2017-09-21
County: DOUGLAS T. FOX, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, P.J., Myse and Hoover, JJ. PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11887 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nathaniel S. Sherrod
and detained to allow the officer to “investigate the circumstances that provoke suspicion,” as long as “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12731 - 2005-03-31
and detained to allow the officer to “investigate the circumstances that provoke suspicion,” as long as “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12731 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in detecting impaired drivers.” He asserts that “[i]t was unclear whether [the officer] was experienced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110586 - 2014-04-22
in detecting impaired drivers.” He asserts that “[i]t was unclear whether [the officer] was experienced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110586 - 2014-04-22
[PDF]
State v. Brad A. Peterson
County: DOUGLAS T. FOX, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, P.J., Myse and Hoover, JJ. PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11888 - 2017-09-21
County: DOUGLAS T. FOX, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, P.J., Myse and Hoover, JJ. PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11888 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals 2018-02-27T09:26:37-0600 CCAP-CDS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209060 - 2018-02-27
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals 2018-02-27T09:26:37-0600 CCAP-CDS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209060 - 2018-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but even if they are not, they face revocation ... for the refusal”). “[T]he power to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90208 - 2014-09-15
, but even if they are not, they face revocation ... for the refusal”). “[T]he power to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90208 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215002 - 2018-06-27
). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215002 - 2018-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 8, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587418 - 2022-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 8, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587418 - 2022-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS
The County contends the Commission is only entitled to due weight deference because “[t]he Commission’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28725 - 2007-04-16
The County contends the Commission is only entitled to due weight deference because “[t]he Commission’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28725 - 2007-04-16