Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21421 - 21430 of 29718 for des.
Search results 21421 - 21430 of 29718 for des.
[PDF]
Orville Oney v. Wolfgang Schrauth
raises an issue of law which we review de novo, by applying the same standards employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8386 - 2017-09-19
raises an issue of law which we review de novo, by applying the same standards employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8386 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Ibid. If, however, “the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle the movant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36519 - 2009-05-18
review de novo. Ibid. If, however, “the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle the movant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36519 - 2009-05-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, such as statutory interpretation, we review the trial court’s decision de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84841 - 2014-09-15
a question of law, such as statutory interpretation, we review the trial court’s decision de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84841 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FITZPATRICK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606158 - 2022-12-30
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FITZPATRICK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606158 - 2022-12-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
we review de novo. See Paige K.B. v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 225, 594 N.W.2d 370 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32463 - 2014-09-15
we review de novo. See Paige K.B. v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 225, 594 N.W.2d 370 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32463 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
are clearly erroneous and considering, de novo, whether the conclusions of law are correct. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118929 - 2014-08-04
are clearly erroneous and considering, de novo, whether the conclusions of law are correct. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118929 - 2014-08-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” See State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233638 - 2019-01-29
of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” See State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233638 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
John W. McDonough v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
of these two statutes. ¶10 Statutory interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17337 - 2017-09-21
of these two statutes. ¶10 Statutory interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17337 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jasmina Ivankovic v. Barbara Giuliani
standard in determining damages is a question of law which we review de novo. See Jauquet Lumber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15378 - 2017-09-21
standard in determining damages is a question of law which we review de novo. See Jauquet Lumber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15378 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kirk L. Griese
is a question of law which we decide de novo. Id. at 680.[3] We concluded in Wille that a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7055 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we decide de novo. Id. at 680.[3] We concluded in Wille that a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7055 - 2005-03-31