Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21421 - 21430 of 51926 for him.

[PDF] NOTICE
with him and the children. She called the police. An officer testified that Lewis admitted having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38453 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
1, 2005. The jury convicted him of burglary but acquitted him of the theft and criminal damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26638 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. LeRoy J. Dean, Jr.
. And, in 95-CM-2006, the circuit court also withheld sentence and placed him on probation for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14689 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Gerald M. Schwartz
settled and satisfied all costs of the disciplinary proceedings brought against him, and has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20406 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from a judgment convicting him of possessing heroin with intent to deliver as a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257582 - 2020-04-15

[PDF] State v. Brian M.
of a dispositional order requiring him to pay $4821.25 in restitution. He argues that the order cannot be extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6457 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jamyi W. v. Keith H.
. appeals from two harassment injunctions prohibiting him from having contact with two children who live
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15961 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
discretion in sentencing him to consecutive terms on crimes that involved the same act. We reject his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07

State v. Earnest Alexander
to suppress evidence. Alexander argues police lacked reasonable suspicion to detain him, so evidence obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19676 - 2005-10-27

Michael R. Luterbach v. Denise M. Luterbach
. Luterbach challenges the trial court's attribution of $69,000 income to him for child support purposes. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9672 - 2005-03-31