Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21421 - 21430 of 65192 for or b.
Search results 21421 - 21430 of 65192 for or b.
State v. Donald R. Davis
not satisfied the second prong of the Strickland test.[2] B. Request for a New Trial. ¶20 Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4455 - 2005-03-31
not satisfied the second prong of the Strickland test.[2] B. Request for a New Trial. ¶20 Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4455 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
A misdemeanor); 943.87 (classifying robbery of a financial institution as a Class C Felony); 973.01(2)(b)6m
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160869 - 2017-09-21
A misdemeanor); 943.87 (classifying robbery of a financial institution as a Class C Felony); 973.01(2)(b)6m
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160869 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frederick N.
for Milwaukee County: MARSHALL B. MURRAY, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 FINE, J. Frederick N., Sr., appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5129 - 2017-09-19
for Milwaukee County: MARSHALL B. MURRAY, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 FINE, J. Frederick N., Sr., appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5129 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eugene A. Pagois
theory of a defense as opposed to the interpretation of the evidence urged by the defense, and b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9135 - 2005-03-31
theory of a defense as opposed to the interpretation of the evidence urged by the defense, and b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9135 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Krier
) as a third offense, in violation of § 346.63(1)(b), Stats. Krier contends that the original trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14912 - 2005-03-31
) as a third offense, in violation of § 346.63(1)(b), Stats. Krier contends that the original trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14912 - 2005-03-31
Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M.P.
. The County argues that Elizabeth’s request for a postponement under § 51.20(10)(e), Stats., “[b]y implication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12270 - 2005-03-31
. The County argues that Elizabeth’s request for a postponement under § 51.20(10)(e), Stats., “[b]y implication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12270 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brenda K. Roberts
§ 346.63(1)(b). Roberts moved to suppress the results of the chemical test as admissible trial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15121 - 2017-09-21
§ 346.63(1)(b). Roberts moved to suppress the results of the chemical test as admissible trial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15121 - 2017-09-21
Sheboygan County v. Cheryl L. M.
, attempt or threat to act under par. (a)2.a. or b., a pattern of recent acts or omissions under par. (a)2.c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3682 - 2005-03-31
, attempt or threat to act under par. (a)2.a. or b., a pattern of recent acts or omissions under par. (a)2.c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3682 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. La Plant’s failure to impeach Seifert was not a result of deficient performance. B. Inadmissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27143 - 2006-11-13
. La Plant’s failure to impeach Seifert was not a result of deficient performance. B. Inadmissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27143 - 2006-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] This is an expedited appeal under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50850 - 2010-06-14
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] This is an expedited appeal under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50850 - 2010-06-14