Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21431 - 21440 of 69439 for as he.
Search results 21431 - 21440 of 69439 for as he.
[PDF]
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Matthew Frank
of a prison disciplinary action. He claims that his time to file the certiorari action should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6615 - 2017-09-19
of a prison disciplinary action. He claims that his time to file the certiorari action should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6615 - 2017-09-19
Brenda Fox v. Daniel Larson
claims the trial court erred in concluding that a letter he had written in response to the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3766 - 2005-03-31
claims the trial court erred in concluding that a letter he had written in response to the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3766 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. He contends the court erred in denying, without a hearing, his request to withdraw his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681995 - 2023-07-26
motion. He contends the court erred in denying, without a hearing, his request to withdraw his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681995 - 2023-07-26
State v. Robert J. Pettis
). Pettis points to the following deficiencies in the plea colloquy. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12578 - 2005-03-31
). Pettis points to the following deficiencies in the plea colloquy. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12578 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth Harris v. Thomas G. Borgen
to the same officer. He raises a number of substantive and procedural issues concerning the disciplinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20379 - 2005-11-22
to the same officer. He raises a number of substantive and procedural issues concerning the disciplinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20379 - 2005-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Specifically, he argued the State’s new prosecution violated the double jeopardy clause because he had been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865741 - 2024-10-23
. Specifically, he argued the State’s new prosecution violated the double jeopardy clause because he had been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865741 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP1142-CR 2 Garcia was charged with OWI, seventh offense, based on evidence obtained when he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846810 - 2024-09-06
. No. 2023AP1142-CR 2 Garcia was charged with OWI, seventh offense, based on evidence obtained when he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846810 - 2024-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP1142-CR 2 Garcia was charged with OWI, seventh offense, based on evidence obtained when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846810 - 2024-09-06
. No. 2023AP1142-CR 2 Garcia was charged with OWI, seventh offense, based on evidence obtained when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846810 - 2024-09-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
you actually guilty of these two offenses? THE DEFENDANT: They, they had, he had the gun, but he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162186 - 2017-09-21
you actually guilty of these two offenses? THE DEFENDANT: They, they had, he had the gun, but he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162186 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard W. Foelker
tests should have been suppressed on grounds that he was denied his statutory right to a urine test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10528 - 2005-03-31
tests should have been suppressed on grounds that he was denied his statutory right to a urine test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10528 - 2005-03-31