Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21431 - 21440 of 83436 for case code.
Search results 21431 - 21440 of 83436 for case code.
COURT OF APPEALS
issue is whether the circuit court had jurisdiction over this case. Larsen argued in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58119 - 2010-12-28
issue is whether the circuit court had jurisdiction over this case. Larsen argued in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58119 - 2010-12-28
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Senecal
AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶3 The facts and procedural history of this case as they bear upon the appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3413 - 2017-09-19
AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶3 The facts and procedural history of this case as they bear upon the appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3413 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Paul R. Benzel
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3528-CR and 97-3529-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13346 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3528-CR and 97-3529-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13346 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND ¶2 Robinson was awaiting sentencing on another drug case when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27981 - 2014-09-15
for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND ¶2 Robinson was awaiting sentencing on another drug case when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27981 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234046 - 2019-01-31
and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234046 - 2019-01-31
[PDF]
Jamyi W. v. Keith H.
harassment statute. That statute provides, as relevant to this case, that it is violated by “[w]hoever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15961 - 2017-09-21
harassment statute. That statute provides, as relevant to this case, that it is violated by “[w]hoever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15961 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Barbara R.K. v. James G.
2002 WI App 47 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-1219
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3933 - 2017-09-20
2002 WI App 47 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-1219
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3933 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159644 - 2017-09-21
2 this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159644 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
a $250 DNA surcharge for the felony case and a $200 DNA surcharge for the misdemeanor case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148198 - 2015-09-01
a $250 DNA surcharge for the felony case and a $200 DNA surcharge for the misdemeanor case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148198 - 2015-09-01
2007 WI APP 113
2007 WI App 113 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP217-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28262 - 2007-04-26
2007 WI App 113 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP217-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28262 - 2007-04-26