Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21431 - 21440 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21431 - 21440 of 30242 for de.
Louis Zink, Jr. v. Akhatar Khwaja
of statutory interpretation which we decide de novo. See Timm v. Portage County Drainage Dist., 145 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15014 - 2005-03-31
of statutory interpretation which we decide de novo. See Timm v. Portage County Drainage Dist., 145 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15014 - 2005-03-31
Door County Department of Health & Family Services v. Scott S.
present questions of law that are reviewed de novo. See, e.g., State v. Migliorino, 150 Wis.2d 513, 524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15269 - 2005-03-31
present questions of law that are reviewed de novo. See, e.g., State v. Migliorino, 150 Wis.2d 513, 524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15269 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355 Wis. 2d 617, 850 N.W.2d 42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064687 - 2026-01-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355 Wis. 2d 617, 850 N.W.2d 42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064687 - 2026-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31385 - 2008-01-07
which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31385 - 2008-01-07
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶11, 325 Wis. 2d 455, 785 N.W.2d 631. We review de novo whether those facts fulfill the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104961 - 2013-12-02
, ¶11, 325 Wis. 2d 455, 785 N.W.2d 631. We review de novo whether those facts fulfill the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104961 - 2013-12-02
State v. Joshua Slagoski
of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d 94, 97, 441 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1989). A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d 94, 97, 441 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1989). A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Banks, 2010 WI App 107, ¶43, 328 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217295 - 2018-08-07
a conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Banks, 2010 WI App 107, ¶43, 328 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217295 - 2018-08-07
[PDF]
James M. Kriska v. Madison Area Technical College
of summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5851 - 2017-09-19
of summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5851 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89147 - 2012-11-13
that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89147 - 2012-11-13
[PDF]
State v. Joseph R. Luebeck
presents a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. See Williams, 255 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24829 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. See Williams, 255 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24829 - 2017-09-21