Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21441 - 21450 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 21441 - 21450 of 98406 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 7, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79054 - 2012-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 7, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79054 - 2012-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewing the circuit court’s exercise of discretion, “we examine the record to determine whether the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43878 - 2009-11-23
reviewing the circuit court’s exercise of discretion, “we examine the record to determine whether the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43878 - 2009-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
by the record. The circuit court reasonably inferred that Jackson would have alerted his lawyer immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137502 - 2015-03-16
by the record. The circuit court reasonably inferred that Jackson would have alerted his lawyer immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137502 - 2015-03-16
COURT OF APPEALS
the County requested that the court deny Kedinger’s motions without a hearing as untimely, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40947 - 2009-09-22
the County requested that the court deny Kedinger’s motions without a hearing as untimely, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40947 - 2009-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
and listening to the recording, the circuit court found that the officer asked Opelt “at least 14 times” if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106102 - 2013-12-26
and listening to the recording, the circuit court found that the officer asked Opelt “at least 14 times” if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106102 - 2013-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion because the prior appeal was still pending and the record was with this court. ¶7 In May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24
the motion because the prior appeal was still pending and the record was with this court. ¶7 In May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
claim on appeal because, as detailed above, the record clearly shows that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132813 - 2015-01-12
claim on appeal because, as detailed above, the record clearly shows that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132813 - 2015-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 20, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42316 - 2009-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 20, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42316 - 2009-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the record reveals that the trial court’s consideration of the easement on the Marshes’ property was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50755 - 2010-06-08
of the record reveals that the trial court’s consideration of the easement on the Marshes’ property was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50755 - 2010-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 3, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63428 - 2011-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 3, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63428 - 2011-05-02