Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21441 - 21450 of 65009 for or b.
Search results 21441 - 21450 of 65009 for or b.
[PDF]
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) & (c) (2001-02). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6482 - 2017-09-19
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) & (c) (2001-02). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6482 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Taxman Investment Company v. Andrew J. Shaw
, not false. B. Forfeiture. ¶8 Shaw’s second counterclaim alleged that Taxman engaged in an unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13591 - 2017-09-21
, not false. B. Forfeiture. ¶8 Shaw’s second counterclaim alleged that Taxman engaged in an unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13591 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Patricia G.
to Porcha. B. DISCUSSION ¶8 Patricia admits that she violated the trial court’s order to be present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6515 - 2017-09-19
to Porcha. B. DISCUSSION ¶8 Patricia admits that she violated the trial court’s order to be present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6515 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
as a repeater. See Wis. Stat. §§ 943.50(1m)(b) & (4)(a), 946.49(1)(a), 939.62(1)(a) (2011-12).[1] Appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127099 - 2014-11-05
as a repeater. See Wis. Stat. §§ 943.50(1m)(b) & (4)(a), 946.49(1)(a), 939.62(1)(a) (2011-12).[1] Appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127099 - 2014-11-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration, as second offenses. See WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a), (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration, as second offenses. See WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a), (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29
State v. James J. Peckham
will not disturb it. B. Ineffective Assistance. ¶13 Peckham’s next claim is that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5318 - 2005-03-31
will not disturb it. B. Ineffective Assistance. ¶13 Peckham’s next claim is that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5318 - 2005-03-31
County of Waukesha v. Robert M. Hallenbeck
of operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited blood alcohol concentration contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
of operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited blood alcohol concentration contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sobriety tests “[b]ecause [Stokes] was being argumentative and combative on scene,” and Officer Fuhrman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102984 - 2017-09-21
sobriety tests “[b]ecause [Stokes] was being argumentative and combative on scene,” and Officer Fuhrman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102984 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determined that Menger’s sentence was neither “unjust” nor “unfair” “[b]ecause … the error committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906580 - 2025-01-29
determined that Menger’s sentence was neither “unjust” nor “unfair” “[b]ecause … the error committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906580 - 2025-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The 2 WISCONSIN STAT. § 346.34(1)(b) provides in relevant part that “[i]n the event any other traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80080 - 2014-09-15
. The 2 WISCONSIN STAT. § 346.34(1)(b) provides in relevant part that “[i]n the event any other traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80080 - 2014-09-15