Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21441 - 21450 of 33082 for vital statistics form.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not accept it into evidence because it was not on the proper form and not certified as required.1 ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78454 - 2014-09-15

2009 WI APP 112
seeking funding to do so. Part of the funding they needed was in the form of a grant, and that grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37593 - 2011-02-07

COURT OF APPEALS
, but the ALJ did not accept it into evidence because it was not on the proper form and not certified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78454 - 2009-10-21

[PDF] Response Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (BLOC)
” approach. This makes sense, as the statistic measures the percentage of an old district’s previous
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefbloc2.pdf - 2022-01-03

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Intervenors-Respondents Johnson et al. re: Proposed Maps
Statistics D/D Pairs 5 1 3 2 3 R/R Pairs 12 16 15 14 11 D/R Pairs 3 7 5 4 7 Trios 1 D/R/R 1 D/D/D 1 R
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224responsebriefintervenors.pdf - 2024-01-22

Jane E. Chen v. John J. Warner
. Further, this is not a case in which either party offered expert testimony or statistical evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6123 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. [9] This statistic is taken from the affidavit of City of Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144677 - 2015-07-20

[PDF] Jane E. Chen v. John J. Warner
, this is not a case in which either party offered expert testimony or statistical evidence of the short- or long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6123 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 60
for summary judgment. It is a part of the record before us. 3 This statistic is taken from the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144677 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby
of the court affirmed the vitality of the distinction between ministerial and discretionary acts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17288 - 2017-09-21