Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21451 - 21460 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21451 - 21460 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183315 - 2017-09-21
review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183315 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gregory Spinner and Marianne Giannis v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment, Inc
review, our standard of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12766 - 2017-09-21
review, our standard of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12766 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of OneWest. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95354 - 2014-09-15
of OneWest. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95354 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 12
. This issue presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. See State v. Rachel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105814 - 2017-09-21
. This issue presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. See State v. Rachel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105814 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
constitutional standards is reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Giebel, 2006 WI App 239, ¶11, 297
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49063 - 2014-09-15
constitutional standards is reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Giebel, 2006 WI App 239, ¶11, 297
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49063 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
which we review de novo.” Ibid. (citation omitted; italics added). A trial court misuses its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67302 - 2014-09-15
which we review de novo.” Ibid. (citation omitted; italics added). A trial court misuses its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67302 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶17 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133694 - 2017-09-21
was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶17 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133694 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” See State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233638 - 2019-01-29
of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” See State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233638 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
WI App 60
of a statute to a given set of facts are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Wiskerchen, 2019
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247870 - 2019-12-06
of a statute to a given set of facts are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Wiskerchen, 2019
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247870 - 2019-12-06
State v. Jeffrey L. Watson
the State’s conduct breached the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14117 - 2005-03-31
the State’s conduct breached the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14117 - 2005-03-31