Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21451 - 21460 of 51735 for him.

[PDF] State v. Christopher S. Vnuk
the judgment of conviction entered against him. The issue on appeal is whether Vnuk’s parents, with whom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25239 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ryan A. Buroker
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Ryan Buroker appeals from a judgment convicting him of three counts of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6298 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
convicting him of operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration, second offense. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33672 - 2008-08-06

State v. Robert N. Kroeplin
the opportunity to obtain evidence that may have allowed him to contest or to challenge the blood test,” which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6729 - 2005-03-31

Legend Diamonds, Inc. v. Diamond Cutters of Milwaukee
against him and Diamond Cutters of Milwaukee jointly and severally after Messnick and Diamond Cutters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4511 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
thought the vehicle was avoiding him. However, on cross-examination, Sweetman conceded the vehicle may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109478 - 2014-03-24

State v. Jeffrey S. Love
asleep as they drove away and did not wake up until the deputy woke him after the accident. Love said he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14286 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Armando M. Tia
a judgment convicting him of second-degree recklessly endangering safety while using a weapon contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8102 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
¶1 PER CURIAM. Antonio Herrera-Ortiz, pro se, appeals a judgment convicting him of one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242458 - 2019-06-26

Michael R. Luterbach v. Denise M. Luterbach
. Luterbach challenges the trial court's attribution of $69,000 income to him for child support purposes. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9672 - 2005-03-31