Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21451 - 21460 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.

State v. Deborah J. Burch
, 605, 558 N.W.2d 696 (Ct. App. 1996). The test of reasonable suspicion is an objective one and must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2478 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mark David Hayter
to adequately investigate his case or prepare for trial. The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6040 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
and actuarial tests showed a high likelihood that he would re-offend, she could not conclude that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26625 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
verdict.” Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d at 503. ¶5 Further, the Schwantes rule is not the test on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121270 - 2005-11-30

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
.” A presumptive test for determining the reasonableness of repairs, which is commonly known as the fifty percent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27478 - 2006-12-18

State v. William T. Anderson
of intoxicants, which led to field sobriety tests and a preliminary breath test. Anderson was subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25720 - 2006-07-04

[PDF] NOTICE
. See State v. Harris, 199 Wis. 2d 227, 256- 63, 544 N.W.2d 545 (1996). The test for harmless error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34098 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Ronald E. Ashmore
a preliminary breath test. When he refused, the officer informed Ashmore he was under arrest for operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20083 - 2017-09-21

Condor Energy, Inc. v. Richard A. Malone
, Richard became a record title owner in the working interest of an oil and gas leasehold in Kansas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3854 - 2005-03-31

David Arnold v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
Arnold and Hallman Lindsay agreed the Arnolds would pay for the contractor’s labor to do this work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6888 - 2005-03-31