Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21461 - 21470 of 58506 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28488 - 2007-03-19

Door County v. Earl F. Lindsay and Eleanor C. Lindsay
with a forestry operation being conducted on land owned by the Lindsays.[1] Door County contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8327 - 2005-03-31

Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
alleging more than twenty-three causes of action.[2] After much discovery and a four-day trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12656 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 146
because the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting certain evidence and testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55177 - 2014-09-15

State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
and bail jumping, and from the trial court's order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9013 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
patdown search conducted at the scene. At trial, the officers who conducted the patdown testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139662 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Krebsbach. The circuit court granted a new trial on the informed consent claim, concluding that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183642 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Shannon Preston v. Meriter Hospital, Inc.
an opinion either as to the standard of care or as to causation. The trial court determined Meriter had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6512 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
- degree recklessly endangering safety while armed. ΒΆ7 A jury trial was held in February 2001.2 Among
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270980 - 2020-07-21

2010 WI APP 146
was not fully tried because the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting certain evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55177 - 2010-11-16