Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21471 - 21480 of 65171 for or b.
Search results 21471 - 21480 of 65171 for or b.
[PDF]
State v. Frederick N.
for Milwaukee County: MARSHALL B. MURRAY, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 FINE, J. Frederick N., Sr., appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5128 - 2017-09-19
for Milwaukee County: MARSHALL B. MURRAY, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 FINE, J. Frederick N., Sr., appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5128 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Anjani K. Mehra v. Bay Watch Condominium Association
precisely the same legal right in respect to the subject matter involved. Amber J.F. v. Richard B., 205
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5099 - 2017-09-19
precisely the same legal right in respect to the subject matter involved. Amber J.F. v. Richard B., 205
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5099 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gary Mahlum
to the conviction for the felony or other crime, as specified in sub. (1) (a) or (b). 6 Section 943.20(3)(d)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14403 - 2014-09-15
to the conviction for the felony or other crime, as specified in sub. (1) (a) or (b). 6 Section 943.20(3)(d)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14403 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constituting first-degree sexual assault, and obstructing an officer, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 948.025(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379939 - 2021-06-22
constituting first-degree sexual assault, and obstructing an officer, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 948.025(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379939 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
used diligent efforts to provide services ordered by the court under § 48.415(2)(b), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9931 - 2017-09-19
used diligent efforts to provide services ordered by the court under § 48.415(2)(b), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence.” See Sec. 62.23(7)(de)2.b. “‘Substantial evidence’ means facts and information, other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
evidence.” See Sec. 62.23(7)(de)2.b. “‘Substantial evidence’ means facts and information, other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the City acted inconsistently with WIS. STAT. § 30.13(3)(b) (2005-06) when it enacted § 90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85112 - 2014-09-15
argues that the City acted inconsistently with WIS. STAT. § 30.13(3)(b) (2005-06) when it enacted § 90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85112 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
); 943.10(1m)(a) (classifying burglary of a building as a Class F); 973.01(2)(b)3. and (d)2. (providing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193931 - 2017-09-21
); 943.10(1m)(a) (classifying burglary of a building as a Class F); 973.01(2)(b)3. and (d)2. (providing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193931 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Allan Lloyd Waldo
) (2001). B. Tuesday/Wednesday Release. ¶13 Waldo’s alternative argument is that even if the tolling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3655 - 2017-09-19
) (2001). B. Tuesday/Wednesday Release. ¶13 Waldo’s alternative argument is that even if the tolling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3655 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
apply to proof of questions of fact in termination proceedings. See WIS. STAT. § 48.299(4)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47198 - 2014-09-15
apply to proof of questions of fact in termination proceedings. See WIS. STAT. § 48.299(4)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47198 - 2014-09-15