Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21481 - 21490 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21481 - 21490 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Kenneth Onapolis v. State
convictions in Wisconsin for forgery and theft. He was then placed on parole. He claims that the “de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24886 - 2017-09-21
convictions in Wisconsin for forgery and theft. He was then placed on parole. He claims that the “de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24886 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). We review this question de novo. State v. Giminski, 2001 WI App 211, ¶11, 247 Wis. 2d 750, 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191966 - 2017-09-21
). We review this question de novo. State v. Giminski, 2001 WI App 211, ¶11, 247 Wis. 2d 750, 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191966 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jack R. Hayes
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Because the trial court did not rule on the deficiency component
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4784 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Because the trial court did not rule on the deficiency component
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4784 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Louis Zink, Jr. v. Akhatar Khwaja
is a question of statutory interpretation which we decide de novo. See Timm v. Portage County Drainage Dist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15014 - 2017-09-21
is a question of statutory interpretation which we decide de novo. See Timm v. Portage County Drainage Dist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15014 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brown County v. Noreen O.
as to determine what its requirements are. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6083 - 2017-09-19
as to determine what its requirements are. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6083 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
will not resolve an appeal from such a de minimis award. See Ziegler v. Wonn, 18 Wis. 2d 382, 389, 118 N.W.2d 706
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43609 - 2009-11-16
will not resolve an appeal from such a de minimis award. See Ziegler v. Wonn, 18 Wis. 2d 382, 389, 118 N.W.2d 706
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43609 - 2009-11-16
Arthur H. Hurckman v. Secura Insurance Company
the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9898 - 2005-03-31
the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9898 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark D. Goad
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13049 - 2005-03-31
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13049 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Stupar River LLC v. Town of Linwood Board of Review
an arm’s-length transaction. Because we review the Board’s assessment decision de novo, we need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17803 - 2017-09-21
an arm’s-length transaction. Because we review the Board’s assessment decision de novo, we need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17803 - 2017-09-21
Gerald Breen v. David J. Winkel
by the circuit court's conclusions of law and decide the matter de novo. First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9740 - 2005-03-31
by the circuit court's conclusions of law and decide the matter de novo. First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9740 - 2005-03-31