Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21481 - 21490 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] State v. Isace A. Whiting
court concluded that its review was de novo, id., ¶11, and its ultimate conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5415 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which we also review de novo. Tesker, 208 Wis. 2d at 605. Ordinance No. 785
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161306 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72163 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Richard F. Pfeiffer
of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See id.; State v. Heft, 185 Wis. 2d 288, 296, 517 N.W.2d 494
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15532 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Charles E. Jackson
intent de novo because although it was also the trial judge, the trial took place approximately twelve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6900 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Liborio Cianciolo v. Antonina Cianciolo
court’s decision de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). ¶7 Liborio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14704 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 42
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96949 - 2014-09-15

[PDF]
acted within the scope of its authority is a question of law reviewed de novo. Breier v. E.C., 130
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277917 - 2020-08-13

[PDF] WI 109
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29811 - 2014-09-15

WI App 122 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2173-CR Complete Titl...
presented is one of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Peters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129281 - 2014-12-18