Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21491 - 21500 of 29823 for des.

Gerald Breen v. David J. Winkel
by the circuit court's conclusions of law and decide the matter de novo. First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9740 - 2005-03-31

Delta Group, Inc. v. DBI, Inc.
. Determining if an insurance company has a duty to defend is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9430 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. (citation omitted). However, we review de novo whether the facts which were properly found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110523 - 2014-04-22

[PDF] NOTICE
the deficient performance was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶49. Counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47621 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Orville Oney v. Wolfgang Schrauth
raises an issue of law which we review de novo, by applying the same standards employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8386 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶31. ¶29 Our review is de novo. Travis, 347 Wis. 2d 142, ¶9 n.9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815791 - 2024-06-20

[PDF] Yehuda Elmakias v. Michael Wayda
of law that we review de novo. See Stern, 185 Wis.2d at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 664. Because the inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14769 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law reviewed de novo. Dubose, 285 Wis. 2d 143, ¶16. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99398 - 2013-07-15

COURT OF APPEALS
are not convinced. ¶23 Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57466 - 2010-12-06

Town of Port Washington v. City of Port Washington
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2730 - 2005-03-31