Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21491 - 21500 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 21491 - 21500 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Allee Boone
892, 898 (Ct. App. 1984). The test to determine whether a witness’ identification of a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11317 - 2005-03-31
892, 898 (Ct. App. 1984). The test to determine whether a witness’ identification of a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11317 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
doubt.” Id., ¶39. In other words, the test here is “whether a circuit court, acting reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76273 - 2014-09-15
doubt.” Id., ¶39. In other words, the test here is “whether a circuit court, acting reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76273 - 2014-09-15
State v. Todd D. Duerst
not explicitly apply this multifactor test. However, the court did state that the OWI-fourth offense charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7467 - 2005-03-31
not explicitly apply this multifactor test. However, the court did state that the OWI-fourth offense charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7467 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
was filed to have a blood specimen tested. The motion was later withdrawn when counsel determined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143004 - 2015-06-16
was filed to have a blood specimen tested. The motion was later withdrawn when counsel determined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143004 - 2015-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that trial counsel was ineffective by (1) failing to request a Daubert1 hearing to test the admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612475 - 2023-01-20
that trial counsel was ineffective by (1) failing to request a Daubert1 hearing to test the admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612475 - 2023-01-20
2006 WI APP 222
. § 82.19.[1] The Rusticks argue the trial court applied an incorrect test of abandonment and placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26404 - 2006-10-30
. § 82.19.[1] The Rusticks argue the trial court applied an incorrect test of abandonment and placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26404 - 2006-10-30
Richard D. Winters, Jr. v. Marianne Cooke
. Winters also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of guilt. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9822 - 2005-03-31
. Winters also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of guilt. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9822 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nadaniel P. Jones
that he had not. Eckstein offered to take a breath test. Halbach then asked Eckstein’s passengers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19583 - 2017-09-21
that he had not. Eckstein offered to take a breath test. Halbach then asked Eckstein’s passengers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19583 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
test simply requires courts to ‘consider all of the circumstances set forth in the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488934 - 2022-03-01
test simply requires courts to ‘consider all of the circumstances set forth in the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488934 - 2022-03-01
[PDF]
State v. John F. Draves
considering the performance prong of the test must assess the reasonableness of trial counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10859 - 2017-09-20
considering the performance prong of the test must assess the reasonableness of trial counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10859 - 2017-09-20