Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2151 - 2160 of 17421 for Cost.

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark G. Pierquet
to pay the costs of the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) proceeding, which total $810.72 as of April 28
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24

[PDF] Lawrence J. Plourde v. John Berends
judgment motion; and an order awarding costs and attorney fees to Lawrence Plourde.2 Habhegger asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25437 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] La Porscha Hamilton v. Lawrence Olson
resulted in an award of costs, fees and reasonable attorney fees. It contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14533 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William J. Gilbert
to make restitution to the client and that he be required to pay the costs of the proceeding. ¶2 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16832 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, attorneys’ fees, and costs. ¶2 In 2007, Crabtree signed a Purchase Agreement by which it agreed to buy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123492 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bruce B. Jacobson
that the costs of the proceeding, which are $9355 as of March 28, 2005, should be assessed against Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18564 - 2017-09-21

Rodney O. Slotten v. State
of his two hangars. He demolished the other, which had a $7,000 replacement cost, and put up a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16282 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
court erred in taxation of cost. Schiessle objected to certain costs in circuit court. However
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93989 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 8
Court of Iowa would be unwarranted and why the costs of this disciplinary proceeding should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27890 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Melvin George v. Donald Kelbach
an amendment to the complaint; (2) he was entitled to $15.97 in costs based on the Kelbachs’ failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20991 - 2017-09-21