Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2151 - 2160 of 13652 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
Search results 2151 - 2160 of 13652 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
State v. John T. Miller
). He moved to dismiss the charge on double-jeopardy grounds, claiming that the administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10763 - 2005-03-31
). He moved to dismiss the charge on double-jeopardy grounds, claiming that the administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10763 - 2005-03-31
WI App 12 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP880-CR Complete Title ...
for a van to take him downtown, Wagner and Metz went up to the door to verify that no one else was inside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34787 - 2009-01-27
for a van to take him downtown, Wagner and Metz went up to the door to verify that no one else was inside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34787 - 2009-01-27
State v. Martin J. Zielinski
, at approximately 7:50 a.m., a team of police officers approached the Zielinski front door. They used a battering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19635 - 2005-09-19
, at approximately 7:50 a.m., a team of police officers approached the Zielinski front door. They used a battering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19635 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
domestic violence battery. At their knock, Micklevitz opened the door to police, who recognized that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233084 - 2019-01-23
domestic violence battery. At their knock, Micklevitz opened the door to police, who recognized that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233084 - 2019-01-23
[PDF]
WI App 12
and Metz went up to the door to verify that no one else was inside. Wagner testified that they went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34787 - 2014-09-15
and Metz went up to the door to verify that no one else was inside. Wagner testified that they went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34787 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 143
conclude Neitzel did not have standing because, at the time the officers unlocked the door, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33800 - 2014-09-15
conclude Neitzel did not have standing because, at the time the officers unlocked the door, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33800 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
unlocked the door, he did not have an expectation of privacy that society is willing to recognize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
unlocked the door, he did not have an expectation of privacy that society is willing to recognize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
Michael Cornwell v. David H. Schwarz
offender rules violates double jeopardy, ex post facto law and due process constitutional protections. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21485 - 2006-02-21
offender rules violates double jeopardy, ex post facto law and due process constitutional protections. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21485 - 2006-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a good argument that they should be able to double check what that expert said. It’s certainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31137 - 2007-12-10
a good argument that they should be able to double check what that expert said. It’s certainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31137 - 2007-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
further contends that it was improperly subjected to double-jeopardy by having to appear before small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31864 - 2008-02-19
further contends that it was improperly subjected to double-jeopardy by having to appear before small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31864 - 2008-02-19