Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2151 - 2160 of 69450 for as he.
Search results 2151 - 2160 of 69450 for as he.
State v. Jerome P. Wiechert
a person responsible for the welfare of the child. See ยง 948.03(3)(a) & (5), Stats. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11349 - 2005-03-31
a person responsible for the welfare of the child. See ยง 948.03(3)(a) & (5), Stats. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11349 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian J. Leiteritz
in his car. At the time of the accident in August 2001, Leiteritz was driving a 1987 car which he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6055 - 2017-09-19
in his car. At the time of the accident in August 2001, Leiteritz was driving a 1987 car which he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6055 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
that Wine appeals. Wine argues that he should be permitted to withdraw his pleas because: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
that Wine appeals. Wine argues that he should be permitted to withdraw his pleas because: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or No. 2011AP158-CR 2 sixth offense (OWI).1 Mendez contends that he is entitled to a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74020 - 2014-09-15
or No. 2011AP158-CR 2 sixth offense (OWI).1 Mendez contends that he is entitled to a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74020 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Domingo S. Hernandez
prepare him for trial. According to Hernandez, he and his counsel met only three times prior to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9367 - 2017-09-19
prepare him for trial. According to Hernandez, he and his counsel met only three times prior to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9367 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenneth J. Hoefer
challenges the validity of a traffic stop which led to his conviction for driving while intoxicated.[2] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13535 - 2005-03-31
challenges the validity of a traffic stop which led to his conviction for driving while intoxicated.[2] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13535 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(OWI).[1] Mendez contends that he is entitled to a new trial because unrecorded statements made by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74020 - 2011-11-22
(OWI).[1] Mendez contends that he is entitled to a new trial because unrecorded statements made by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74020 - 2011-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
driving. He contends that, following his arrest, he was improperly denied his statutory right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31609 - 2009-09-13
driving. He contends that, following his arrest, he was improperly denied his statutory right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31609 - 2009-09-13
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Church
of conviction and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4954 - 2017-09-19
of conviction and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4954 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
, 1998. It is from this order that Wine appeals. Wine argues that he should be permitted to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14041 - 2014-09-15
, 1998. It is from this order that Wine appeals. Wine argues that he should be permitted to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14041 - 2014-09-15