Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2151 - 2160 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2151 - 2160 of 30059 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64172 - 2011-05-17
an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64172 - 2011-05-17
[PDF]
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Department of Workforce Development
when it applied a de novo standard of review and that DWD’s decision is unreasonable, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13492 - 2017-09-21
when it applied a de novo standard of review and that DWD’s decision is unreasonable, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13492 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination of whether counsel was ineffective presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115232 - 2017-09-21
determination of whether counsel was ineffective presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115232 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
River Alliance of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6244 - 2017-09-19
County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6244 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
questions of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶5 The dispositive issue on appeal is which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171900 - 2017-09-21
questions of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶5 The dispositive issue on appeal is which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171900 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Marcella De Peters Electronic Notice Patricia J. Hanson Electronic Notice You
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535120 - 2022-06-22
Marcella De Peters Electronic Notice Patricia J. Hanson Electronic Notice You
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535120 - 2022-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we often give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30004 - 2007-08-15
evidence. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we often give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30004 - 2007-08-15
[PDF]
Frank T. White v. Richard Raemisch
” to cause harm. Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 6 (1992) (citation omitted). The de minimus use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15778 - 2017-09-21
” to cause harm. Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 6 (1992) (citation omitted). The de minimus use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15778 - 2017-09-21
State v. Antonio Q. Cruz
, this court’s review is de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis. 2d 180, 190-91, 577 N.W.2d 794 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3359 - 2009-02-12
, this court’s review is de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis. 2d 180, 190-91, 577 N.W.2d 794 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3359 - 2009-02-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. 1 Travanti Schmidt appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-18
P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. 1 Travanti Schmidt appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-18