Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21501 - 21510 of 58937 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 21501 - 21510 of 58937 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Terrence L. Webb
in denying his call for a new trial based on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Because we reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10964 - 2005-03-31
in denying his call for a new trial based on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Because we reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10964 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI App 121
the motion and dismissed all claims against Strom.[3] At the same time, Auto-Owners moved for bifurcation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53145 - 2011-08-21
the motion and dismissed all claims against Strom.[3] At the same time, Auto-Owners moved for bifurcation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53145 - 2011-08-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
punishment for a single act of recklessly endangering safety. White claims that the two multiplicitous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830224 - 2024-07-23
punishment for a single act of recklessly endangering safety. White claims that the two multiplicitous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830224 - 2024-07-23
Harry T. Staver v. Milwaukee County
. Staver claims: (1) the trial court should have struck the County’s trial court summary judgment brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21220 - 2006-03-22
. Staver claims: (1) the trial court should have struck the County’s trial court summary judgment brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21220 - 2006-03-22
Herbert M. Schauer v. Matthew S. Baker
that the Schauers’ claim was barred by Wis. Stat. § 893.33(2). ¶3 The circuit court initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5392 - 2005-03-31
that the Schauers’ claim was barred by Wis. Stat. § 893.33(2). ¶3 The circuit court initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5392 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals an order denying postconviction relief. Taylor raises two issues. First, he claims the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168205 - 2017-09-21
appeals an order denying postconviction relief. Taylor raises two issues. First, he claims the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168205 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
claims that were without merit. We affirm the circuit court’s decision denying Richardson’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141601 - 2015-05-12
claims that were without merit. We affirm the circuit court’s decision denying Richardson’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141601 - 2015-05-12
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
children[2] and an order denying post-verdict relief. She claims that her trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2203 - 2005-03-31
children[2] and an order denying post-verdict relief. She claims that her trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2203 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
children[2] and an order denying post-verdict relief. She claims that her trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2204 - 2005-03-31
children[2] and an order denying post-verdict relief. She claims that her trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2204 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James R. Welch v. City of Appleton
, if correct, preclude applying the immunity doctrine. The Welches also claim there are genuine issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5954 - 2017-09-19
, if correct, preclude applying the immunity doctrine. The Welches also claim there are genuine issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5954 - 2017-09-19