Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21501 - 21510 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21501 - 21510 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 190
. That resentencing is the subject of this appeal. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29712 - 2014-09-15
. That resentencing is the subject of this appeal. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29712 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
377. Then, “we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32281 - 2014-09-15
377. Then, “we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32281 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 33, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1998), for the proposition that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217371 - 2018-08-09
, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 33, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1998), for the proposition that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217371 - 2018-08-09
Michael F. W. v. Betty A. W.
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 563. Whether a defect in statutory compliance is central
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6649 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 563. Whether a defect in statutory compliance is central
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6649 - 2005-03-31
Stupar River LLC v. Town of Linwood Board of Review
transaction. Because we review the Board’s assessment decision de novo, we need not address whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17803 - 2005-05-02
transaction. Because we review the Board’s assessment decision de novo, we need not address whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17803 - 2005-05-02
WI App 26 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP829 Complete Title of Ca...
, 717 N.W.2d 258. Here, the facts are undisputed. The interpretation of statutes is subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91596 - 2013-11-17
, 717 N.W.2d 258. Here, the facts are undisputed. The interpretation of statutes is subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91596 - 2013-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Fifer v. Dix, 2000 WI App 66, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243610 - 2019-07-17
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Fifer v. Dix, 2000 WI App 66, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243610 - 2019-07-17
2007 WI APP 144
). Where the facts are not in dispute, there remain only questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29220 - 2007-06-26
). Where the facts are not in dispute, there remain only questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29220 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson
Wis. 2d 714, 605 N.W.2d 836. Finally, we construe a deferred prosecution agreement de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4688 - 2017-09-19
Wis. 2d 714, 605 N.W.2d 836. Finally, we construe a deferred prosecution agreement de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4688 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Scott Michael Harwood
; however, our application of the law to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6031 - 2017-09-19
; however, our application of the law to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6031 - 2017-09-19