Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21511 - 21520 of 29712 for des.
Search results 21511 - 21520 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. State v. Owen, 202 Wis.2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d 50, 59 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14414 - 2014-09-15
of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. State v. Owen, 202 Wis.2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d 50, 59 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14414 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Housing Horizons, LLC v. The Alexander Company, Inc.
is a question of law which we review de novo. See Brown v. LaChance, 165 Wis.2d 52, 65, 477 N.W.2d 296, 302
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14926 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which we review de novo. See Brown v. LaChance, 165 Wis.2d 52, 65, 477 N.W.2d 296, 302
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14926 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roger D. H. v. Virginia O.
discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo. F.R., 225 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3368 - 2017-09-19
discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo. F.R., 225 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3368 - 2017-09-19
Wisconsin Gas Company v. Beth Bauer
). ¶14 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3598 - 2005-03-31
). ¶14 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3598 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Adela S. Hagen v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Statutory interpretation is a question of law which a court generally reviews under a de novo standard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16899 - 2017-09-21
. Statutory interpretation is a question of law which a court generally reviews under a de novo standard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16899 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Raymond J. Topps v. County of Walworth
the interpretation of WIS. STAT. § 75.521. Interpretation of a statute is subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5024 - 2017-09-19
the interpretation of WIS. STAT. § 75.521. Interpretation of a statute is subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5024 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph R. Luebeck
that we review de novo. See Williams, 255 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17. ¶9 The State frames the discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24829 - 2006-05-30
that we review de novo. See Williams, 255 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17. ¶9 The State frames the discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24829 - 2006-05-30
W. George Bowring v. Wisconsin Division of Highways & Transportation
. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Torke/Wirth/Pujara v. Lakeshore Towers, 192 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10308 - 2005-03-31
. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Torke/Wirth/Pujara v. Lakeshore Towers, 192 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10308 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 138
of the sidewalk. The Gulbrandsens appeal. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39827 - 2014-09-15
of the sidewalk. The Gulbrandsens appeal. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39827 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Free’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct because the instances were “of such de minimus effect so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67962 - 2011-07-19
Free’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct because the instances were “of such de minimus effect so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67962 - 2011-07-19