Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21511 - 21520 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21511 - 21520 of 29823 for des.
Cathy Wallace v. Adult Family Care Homes
reviews an application of established facts to the applicable law de novo as a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13062 - 2005-03-31
reviews an application of established facts to the applicable law de novo as a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13062 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 190
We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. Baierl v. McTaggart, 2001 WI 107, ¶14, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29712 - 2007-08-27
We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. Baierl v. McTaggart, 2001 WI 107, ¶14, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29712 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standards. Id., ¶25. ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134506 - 2015-02-04
omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standards. Id., ¶25. ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134506 - 2015-02-04
State v. David Guzman
was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15351 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127‑28, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15351 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88998 - 2012-11-05
. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88998 - 2012-11-05
Robert Pasko v. City of Milwaukee
. ¶6 Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15960 - 2005-03-31
. ¶6 Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15960 - 2005-03-31
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. App. 1995). The proper construction of a statute is a question of law, which we normally review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4505 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1995). The proper construction of a statute is a question of law, which we normally review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4505 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 19, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
of Review. ¶8 We review the grant or denial of a summary judgment motion de novo and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59032 - 2011-01-18
of Review. ¶8 We review the grant or denial of a summary judgment motion de novo and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59032 - 2011-01-18
[PDF]
James A. Holzbauer v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.
). In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20014 - 2017-09-21
). In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20014 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mardie Hartenstein v. Pekin Insurance Company
to decide that case.” II. ¶15 We review a trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25506 - 2017-09-21
to decide that case.” II. ¶15 We review a trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25506 - 2017-09-21