Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21511 - 21520 of 57733 for id.
Search results 21511 - 21520 of 57733 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Kleser
in a process of reasoning based on legally relevant factors.” Id. at 355. The primary factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20679 - 2017-09-21
in a process of reasoning based on legally relevant factors.” Id. at 355. The primary factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20679 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
based on a mistake only if the mistake was “justifiable” and “excusable under the circumstances.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687523 - 2023-08-10
based on a mistake only if the mistake was “justifiable” and “excusable under the circumstances.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687523 - 2023-08-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
reach. Id. We review de novo a party’s claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35230 - 2014-09-15
reach. Id. We review de novo a party’s claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35230 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury in making a reasonable analysis of the evidence.” Id. (citation omitted). However, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239778 - 2019-05-01
the jury in making a reasonable analysis of the evidence.” Id. (citation omitted). However, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239778 - 2019-05-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to focus on the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. See id., 466 U.S. at 697 (“If it is easier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526399 - 2022-06-01
to focus on the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. See id., 466 U.S. at 697 (“If it is easier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526399 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
Reginald C. Bruskewitz v. Tellurian, Inc.
by accepting the plain meaning of the language used in the statute. Id. If the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14447 - 2017-09-21
by accepting the plain meaning of the language used in the statute. Id. If the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14447 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey S. Gill
of search or arrest. Id. It is not surprising, then, that the United States Supreme Court has recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17950 - 2005-05-03
of search or arrest. Id. It is not surprising, then, that the United States Supreme Court has recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17950 - 2005-05-03
Kelly F. Mulder v. MSI Insurance Company
). “[A]ny fact which tends to prove a material issue is relevant.” Id. at 730, 324 N.W.2d at 429 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11043 - 2013-10-16
). “[A]ny fact which tends to prove a material issue is relevant.” Id. at 730, 324 N.W.2d at 429 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11043 - 2013-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
court has improperly applied the facts of record to the accepted legal standards. See id. We may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36843 - 2009-06-17
court has improperly applied the facts of record to the accepted legal standards. See id. We may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36843 - 2009-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS
range of professionally competent assistance.” Id., 466 U.S. at 690. To prove prejudice, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50752 - 2010-06-07
range of professionally competent assistance.” Id., 466 U.S. at 690. To prove prejudice, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50752 - 2010-06-07