Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21511 - 21520 of 64166 for records.
Search results 21511 - 21520 of 64166 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603646 - 2022-12-22
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603646 - 2022-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Clarice McGee
that McGee had a substantial prior record of criminal activity— including convictions of possessing cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21086 - 2017-09-21
that McGee had a substantial prior record of criminal activity— including convictions of possessing cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21086 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97823 - 2013-06-03
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97823 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129467 - 2017-09-21
not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129467 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy N. Talley
or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. See State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12330 - 2017-09-21
or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. See State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12330 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel E. La Fave
. Because the record supports the trial court's findings of fact and those findings defeat LaFave's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31
. Because the record supports the trial court's findings of fact and those findings defeat LaFave's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174402 - 2017-09-21
). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174402 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
a copy of the report, but did not file a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122145 - 2014-09-17
a copy of the report, but did not file a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122145 - 2014-09-17
Thomas M. Holmgreen v. John A. Hulleman
that these documents are not a part of the record. The Holmgreens consequently move for fees and costs for what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25479 - 2006-06-12
that these documents are not a part of the record. The Holmgreens consequently move for fees and costs for what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25479 - 2006-06-12
State v. Gregory Poston
. The record and briefs, as with many pro se appeals, are confusing. Although Poston also sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12669 - 2005-03-31
. The record and briefs, as with many pro se appeals, are confusing. Although Poston also sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12669 - 2005-03-31