Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21521 - 21530 of 29832 for des.
Search results 21521 - 21530 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Scott Michael Harwood
; however, our application of the law to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6031 - 2017-09-19
; however, our application of the law to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6031 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶13 Smith contends that the circuit court clearly erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219446 - 2018-09-20
that this court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶13 Smith contends that the circuit court clearly erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219446 - 2018-09-20
State v. Charles E. Jackson
the postconviction court’s determination on discriminatory intent de novo because although it was also the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6900 - 2005-03-31
the postconviction court’s determination on discriminatory intent de novo because although it was also the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6900 - 2005-03-31
Gerald Witkowski v. Barry Weber
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. Factual findings made by the circuit court shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15472 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. Factual findings made by the circuit court shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Louis Kapischke v. County of Walworth
statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13771 - 2014-09-15
statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13771 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jonathan Reuter v. Theresa M. Murphy
for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Deininger, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16342 - 2017-09-21
for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Deininger, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16342 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Id., ¶19. However, we will uphold the circuit court’s factual findings unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80829 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. Id., ¶19. However, we will uphold the circuit court’s factual findings unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80829 - 2014-09-15
John W. McDonough v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Jungbluth v. Hometown, Inc., 201 Wis. 2d 320, 327, 548
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17337 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Jungbluth v. Hometown, Inc., 201 Wis. 2d 320, 327, 548
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17337 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29811 - 2007-07-23
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29811 - 2007-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
Living appeals. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79396 - 2012-03-12
Living appeals. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79396 - 2012-03-12