Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21521 - 21530 of 29832 for des.
Search results 21521 - 21530 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Andrew B. Lamont
proportion, and as such involves “constitutional facts” that are reviewed de novo. State v. Pulizzano, 155
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12769 - 2017-09-21
proportion, and as such involves “constitutional facts” that are reviewed de novo. State v. Pulizzano, 155
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12769 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 433. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo review. Id. If the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101375 - 2013-08-22
N.W.2d 433. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo review. Id. If the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101375 - 2013-08-22
State v. Ary L. Jones, Sr.
Jones’ double jeopardy protections have been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31
Jones’ double jeopardy protections have been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo using the same methodology used by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818206 - 2024-06-26
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo using the same methodology used by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818206 - 2024-06-26
97-CV-1212 James Servais v. Kraft Foods, Inc.
claims is a question of law, which we review de novo. Prentice v. Title Ins. Co. of Minnesota, 176 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16283 - 2005-03-31
claims is a question of law, which we review de novo. Prentice v. Title Ins. Co. of Minnesota, 176 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there are no material facts in dispute. Id., ¶5. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Fortier v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981589 - 2025-07-10
there are no material facts in dispute. Id., ¶5. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Fortier v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981589 - 2025-07-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a), a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶8. ¶8 WISCONSIN STAT. § 51.20(7) provides time limits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344677 - 2021-03-11
)(a), a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶8. ¶8 WISCONSIN STAT. § 51.20(7) provides time limits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344677 - 2021-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but we review de novo whether counsel’s conduct constitutes constitutionally ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635941 - 2023-03-22
, but we review de novo whether counsel’s conduct constitutes constitutionally ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635941 - 2023-03-22
[PDF]
Joshua Scheideler v. Smith & Associates, Inc.
of the partial settlement agreement presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Unigard Ins. Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10331 - 2017-09-20
of the partial settlement agreement presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Unigard Ins. Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10331 - 2017-09-20
State v. Shuron C. Davis
review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however, “‘the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4789 - 2005-03-31
review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however, “‘the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4789 - 2005-03-31