Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21521 - 21530 of 29832 for des.

[PDF] NOTICE
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36413 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Susan Ulrich v. Glenn Zemke
). Whether the circuit court utilized the proper legal standard is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4306 - 2017-09-19

H. A. Friend & Company v. Professional Stationery, Inc.
for relief is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 923. Here, we must determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25421 - 2006-07-25

[PDF] State v. Bernard G. Tainter
354. We review constitutional and statutory interpretation questions de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4441 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jasmina Ivankovic v. Barbara Giuliani
standard in determining damages is a question of law which we review de novo. See Jauquet Lumber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15378 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David S. Frederick
review de novo whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial. Id. Frederick argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13795 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
application of constitutional principles to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34977 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
review the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66075 - 2011-06-20

State v. Colin C. Morse
). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Second, if the initial joinder was proper, we review whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12405 - 2005-03-31

State v. Corey Miller
review de novo.… However, if the motion fails to allege sufficient facts, the circuit court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12493 - 2005-03-31