Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21521 - 21530 of 63531 for records/1000.
Search results 21521 - 21530 of 63531 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not in conflict with the statutory provision. No. 2024AP1036 8 Therefore, based on the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932371 - 2025-03-25
not in conflict with the statutory provision. No. 2024AP1036 8 Therefore, based on the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932371 - 2025-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. The record in this case does not demonstrate that the caller was vulnerable to criminal liability had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29994 - 2007-08-15
. The record in this case does not demonstrate that the caller was vulnerable to criminal liability had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29994 - 2007-08-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Aware of Hanson’s drug-related record and “actually seeing something that I know is directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970388 - 2025-06-18
.” Aware of Hanson’s drug-related record and “actually seeing something that I know is directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970388 - 2025-06-18
[PDF]
State v. Darrin L. Britt
justifying resentencing; (10) that the trial court improperly considered his juvenile record when sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10224 - 2017-09-20
justifying resentencing; (10) that the trial court improperly considered his juvenile record when sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10224 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and conducting an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195401 - 2017-09-21
and conducting an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195401 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[sufficient] facts, ‘or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190341 - 2017-09-21
[sufficient] facts, ‘or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190341 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of the record, “there [wa]s no basis for reversing the judgment of conviction … [and a]ny further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27303 - 2006-12-04
of the record, “there [wa]s no basis for reversing the judgment of conviction … [and a]ny further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27303 - 2006-12-04
COURT OF APPEALS
liability and did not otherwise understand the concept. Because the record supports the conclusion Perez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132233 - 2014-12-29
liability and did not otherwise understand the concept. Because the record supports the conclusion Perez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132233 - 2014-12-29
CA Blank Order
independent review of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93868 - 2013-03-05
independent review of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93868 - 2013-03-05
[PDF]
Thomas Dale Bottomley v. Linda Lee Bottomley
Thomas failed to include as part of the record the necessary affidavits regarding Linda's attorney's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10402 - 2017-09-20
Thomas failed to include as part of the record the necessary affidavits regarding Linda's attorney's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10402 - 2017-09-20