Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21531 - 21540 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21531 - 21540 of 29823 for des.
Kickers of Wisconsin, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
(4), Stats., our review is de novo. See Friendship I, 181 Wis.2d at 219, 511 N.W.2d at 350; Waushara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8018 - 2005-03-31
(4), Stats., our review is de novo. See Friendship I, 181 Wis.2d at 219, 511 N.W.2d at 350; Waushara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8018 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶7 The State first argues that the defense team
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58142 - 2014-09-15
or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶7 The State first argues that the defense team
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58142 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 131
. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law subject to de novo review. Village of Lannon v. Wood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28806 - 2014-09-15
. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law subject to de novo review. Village of Lannon v. Wood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28806 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Belinda Snopek v. Lakeland Medical Center
retroactively. This is a question of law which we review de novo. See Salzman v. DNR, 168 Wis.2d 523, 528
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11872 - 2017-09-21
retroactively. This is a question of law which we review de novo. See Salzman v. DNR, 168 Wis.2d 523, 528
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11872 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ruth Johnson v. County of Crawford
is an issue of law, which this court decides de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8517 - 2017-09-19
is an issue of law, which this court decides de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8517 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Liborio Cianciolo v. Antonina Cianciolo
court’s decision de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). ¶7 Liborio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14903 - 2017-09-21
court’s decision de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). ¶7 Liborio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14903 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven Buckingham
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12409 - 2014-09-15
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12409 - 2014-09-15
Cathy Wallace v. Adult Family Care Homes
reviews an application of established facts to the applicable law de novo as a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13062 - 2005-03-31
reviews an application of established facts to the applicable law de novo as a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13062 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 190
We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. Baierl v. McTaggart, 2001 WI 107, ¶14, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29712 - 2007-08-27
We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. Baierl v. McTaggart, 2001 WI 107, ¶14, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29712 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standards. Id., ¶25. ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134506 - 2015-02-04
omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standards. Id., ¶25. ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134506 - 2015-02-04