Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21531 - 21540 of 64166 for records.
Search results 21531 - 21540 of 64166 for records.
State v. David Mikel
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11017 - 2005-03-31
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11017 - 2005-03-31
State v. Curtiss J. Swoboda
, 493 (1992). Discretion contemplates a logical process of reasoning based on the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8274 - 2005-03-31
, 493 (1992). Discretion contemplates a logical process of reasoning based on the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8274 - 2005-03-31
State v. James L. Kirk
. The record belies this claim. Kirk’s attorney made a demand for discovery and acknowledged that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6644 - 2005-03-31
. The record belies this claim. Kirk’s attorney made a demand for discovery and acknowledged that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6644 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shawn R. H.
the court to apply the relevant law to the facts of record to reach a rational conclusion. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13405 - 2017-09-21
the court to apply the relevant law to the facts of record to reach a rational conclusion. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13405 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mary C. Rath
that the trial judge was prejudiced against her, contending—without support in the record—that a friend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2792 - 2005-03-31
that the trial judge was prejudiced against her, contending—without support in the record—that a friend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191740 - 2017-09-21
and reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191740 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541064 - 2022-07-12
of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541064 - 2022-07-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=828923 - 2024-07-24
review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=828923 - 2024-07-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, as required by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352511 - 2021-04-06
an independent review of the record, as required by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352511 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Smith could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316550 - 2020-12-22
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Smith could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316550 - 2020-12-22