Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21541 - 21550 of 29712 for des.
Search results 21541 - 21550 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to believe the previous amount of child support was de minimis, going so far as to remark that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903882 - 2025-01-22
to believe the previous amount of child support was de minimis, going so far as to remark that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903882 - 2025-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Snyder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28330 - 2007-03-06
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Snyder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28330 - 2007-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: Linda M. van de water, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Jon Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72163 - 2011-10-11
for Waukesha County: Linda M. van de water, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Jon Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72163 - 2011-10-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing. ¶23 When a postconviction motion is denied without an evidentiary hearing, we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701595 - 2023-09-12
hearing. ¶23 When a postconviction motion is denied without an evidentiary hearing, we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701595 - 2023-09-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 283 Wis. 2d 300, ¶10. We review this question de novo. Id. II. The Circuit Court Properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649993 - 2023-04-27
, 283 Wis. 2d 300, ¶10. We review this question de novo. Id. II. The Circuit Court Properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649993 - 2023-04-27
State v. Eddie McAttee
evidence, we determine de novo whether the facts, here undisputed, satisfy the constitutional standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3149 - 2005-03-31
evidence, we determine de novo whether the facts, here undisputed, satisfy the constitutional standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3149 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson
. Finally, we construe a deferred prosecution agreement de novo. See State v. Toliver, 187 Wis. 2d 346, 355
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4688 - 2005-03-31
. Finally, we construe a deferred prosecution agreement de novo. See State v. Toliver, 187 Wis. 2d 346, 355
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4688 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
Admission of Rusch, 171 Wis. 2d 523, 528-29, 492 N.W.2d 153 (1992). We review legal conclusions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112193 - 2014-05-08
Admission of Rusch, 171 Wis. 2d 523, 528-29, 492 N.W.2d 153 (1992). We review legal conclusions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112193 - 2014-05-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
and substantial breach of the plea agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57475 - 2014-09-15
and substantial breach of the plea agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57475 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mardie Hartenstein v. Pekin Insurance Company
to decide that case.” II. ¶15 We review a trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25506 - 2017-09-21
to decide that case.” II. ¶15 We review a trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25506 - 2017-09-21