Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21551 - 21560 of 29712 for des.
Search results 21551 - 21560 of 29712 for des.
Door County Department of Health & Family Services v. Scott S.
present questions of law that are reviewed de novo. See, e.g., State v. Migliorino, 150 Wis.2d 513, 524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15269 - 2005-03-31
present questions of law that are reviewed de novo. See, e.g., State v. Migliorino, 150 Wis.2d 513, 524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15269 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. If the motion raises such facts, the trial court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107713 - 2014-02-03
. This is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. If the motion raises such facts, the trial court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107713 - 2014-02-03
State v. Shawn R. Lee
. The construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31
. The construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is subject to de novo review. We agree and conduct our review accordingly. ¶6 The Final Report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59949 - 2011-02-15
is subject to de novo review. We agree and conduct our review accordingly. ¶6 The Final Report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59949 - 2011-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101362 - 2013-08-28
, which we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101362 - 2013-08-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
face.” See ibid. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109418 - 2017-09-21
face.” See ibid. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109418 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts de novo. See Dalton, 383 Wis. 2d 147, ¶33. This process requires courts to “analyze issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610228 - 2023-01-18
facts de novo. See Dalton, 383 Wis. 2d 147, ¶33. This process requires courts to “analyze issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610228 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
834. Then, we review the circuit court’s determination of the constitutional question de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239895 - 2019-04-30
834. Then, we review the circuit court’s determination of the constitutional question de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239895 - 2019-04-30
[PDF]
The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
interpretation, which presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10853 - 2017-09-20
interpretation, which presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10853 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
violations in three steps, each of which presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102961 - 2017-09-21
violations in three steps, each of which presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102961 - 2017-09-21