Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21551 - 21560 of 29827 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the due process right to be sentenced on accurate information is a constitutional question we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181780 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FMN Management Services, Inc. v. Kolb
). Applying the same methodology, we review a circuit court’s summary judgment decision de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14637 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Winnebago County Department of Health & Human Services v. Diane L.M.
. retroactively. Whether to retroactively apply the holding of a case is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7628 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gabriel L. Ortiz
statute, WIS. STAT. § 973.20. We review this question de novo without deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, but we review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. See State v. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121579 - 2014-09-16

COURT OF APPEALS
¶11 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Borek Cranberry Marsh, Inc. v. Jackson Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86915 - 2012-09-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
performance fell below the constitutional minimum is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 634. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=924435 - 2025-03-12

2006 WI APP 235
stop meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26898 - 2006-11-20

[PDF] NOTICE
of a statute is a question of law, reviewed de novo. State v. Allen M., 214 Wis. 2d 302, 313, 571 N.W.2d 872
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36247 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Ronald Binon v. Great Northern Insurance Company
a question of law which we review de novo, we nevertheless value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12193 - 2017-09-21