Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21551 - 21560 of 68246 for law.

John Bularz v. Paul Hinkfuss
as a matter of law. Trampf v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Co., 199 Wis. 2d 380, 384, 544 N.W.2d 596 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6176 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey L. Sheets
a law enforcement officer to seize a motor vehicle, or, if the motor vehicle is not ordered seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8853 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
based on an erroneous view of the law. Therefore, we summarily reverse the order and remand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254441 - 2020-02-18

[PDF] NOTICE
“The trial court’s decision that a refusal is improper is a question of law. As an appellate court, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28346 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Lucy A. Goebel v. Henry S. Goebel
and attorney fees. ¶6 Henry’s first argument is that the trial court misstated the law concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15137 - 2017-09-21

State v. Gregory A. Zimdars
denial of his suppression motion. LAW AND DISCUSSION ¶7 In reviewing a trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6641 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Shirley Y. Godiwalla, M.D. v. State of WI Medical Examining Bd.
& LICENSING DIVISION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24985 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the robbery among themselves. In September 2006, Young’s girlfriend revealed to law enforcement that she had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240885 - 2019-05-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶6 Whether claim preclusion applies to a certain set of facts presents a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204937 - 2017-12-14

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 1, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
] The application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law for our de novo review. Ansani v. Cascade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28270 - 2007-02-28