Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21571 - 21580 of 64755 for b's.
Search results 21571 - 21580 of 64755 for b's.
State v. Booker T. Shipp
to make a more specific inquiry before excusing Groves cannot constitute ineffective assistance. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12868 - 2005-03-31
to make a more specific inquiry before excusing Groves cannot constitute ineffective assistance. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12868 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
because “[b]oth parties regularly slept in the nude and saw each other nude on a regular basis.”[5] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46961 - 2010-03-03
because “[b]oth parties regularly slept in the nude and saw each other nude on a regular basis.”[5] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46961 - 2010-03-03
[PDF]
State v. Roger H. Splitt
. Sec. 939.62(2m)(b)2. A serious sex offense includes second-degree sexual assault of a child. Sec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3073 - 2017-09-19
. Sec. 939.62(2m)(b)2. A serious sex offense includes second-degree sexual assault of a child. Sec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3073 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Katrina D. Campbell
. § 948.03(2)(b) (2001-02). 1 Campbell claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5696 - 2017-09-19
. § 948.03(2)(b) (2001-02). 1 Campbell claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5696 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and three years’ extended supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 946.49(1)(b), 973.01(2)(b)8., 973.01(2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595333 - 2022-11-29
confinement and three years’ extended supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 946.49(1)(b), 973.01(2)(b)8., 973.01(2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595333 - 2022-11-29
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michelle L. Danielson
Danielson violated supreme court rules regarding a lawyer's conduct, contrary to SCR 22.26(1)(a) and (b),3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24947 - 2017-09-21
Danielson violated supreme court rules regarding a lawyer's conduct, contrary to SCR 22.26(1)(a) and (b),3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the entirety of Dillon’s prejudice argument is that “[b]y not requesting a jury instruction that specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143653 - 2017-09-21
, the entirety of Dillon’s prejudice argument is that “[b]y not requesting a jury instruction that specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143653 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.”); § 802.01(2)(b) (supporting records and papers “shall be served with the notice of motion and shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196836 - 2017-09-21
.”); § 802.01(2)(b) (supporting records and papers “shall be served with the notice of motion and shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196836 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. App. 1989) (“[B]oth monetary payments to the custodial parent and the assignment of responsibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89039 - 2014-09-15
. App. 1989) (“[B]oth monetary payments to the custodial parent and the assignment of responsibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89039 - 2014-09-15
State v. Samuel L. Hogan
, 1995, Hogan, his friend David Clarke and Clarke’s girlfriend, Lulu B., went to a tavern at 4:00 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11514 - 2005-03-31
, 1995, Hogan, his friend David Clarke and Clarke’s girlfriend, Lulu B., went to a tavern at 4:00 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11514 - 2005-03-31