Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21581 - 21590 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 21581 - 21590 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The record belies his claim. After outlining the maximum possible sentences for each crime, the following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657527 - 2023-05-16
. The record belies his claim. After outlining the maximum possible sentences for each crime, the following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657527 - 2023-05-16
Jon F. T. v. Karen L.
daughter, Erin, with her mother, Karen L. Jon T. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16245 - 2005-03-31
daughter, Erin, with her mother, Karen L. Jon T. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16245 - 2005-03-31
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Roger C. Krejchik and Maxine Krejchik
. and Ag Acceptance Corporation (collectively Ag Services) appeal an order dismissing a claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3406 - 2005-03-31
. and Ag Acceptance Corporation (collectively Ag Services) appeal an order dismissing a claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3406 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
outweighs the finality of judgments”; (4) “whether there is a meritorious defense to the claim”; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974839 - 2025-06-26
outweighs the finality of judgments”; (4) “whether there is a meritorious defense to the claim”; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974839 - 2025-06-26
[PDF]
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. AM International, Inc.
for summary judgment, arguing that Cincinnati’s claims were barred by the economic loss doctrine. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13481 - 2017-09-21
for summary judgment, arguing that Cincinnati’s claims were barred by the economic loss doctrine. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13481 - 2017-09-21
Jamie P. Fritz v. Mid-States Footwear Corporation
judgment and dismissing their claim against the Joe Wilde Company.[1] Mid-States also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10503 - 2005-03-31
judgment and dismissing their claim against the Joe Wilde Company.[1] Mid-States also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10503 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frank L. Little
claimed to not remember this statement. ¶8 Also contrary to Collins’ testimony, Wing testified she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7270 - 2017-09-20
claimed to not remember this statement. ¶8 Also contrary to Collins’ testimony, Wing testified she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7270 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
Woods and his trial counsel testified about Woods’s plea withdrawal claims: his failure to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44956 - 2009-12-21
Woods and his trial counsel testified about Woods’s plea withdrawal claims: his failure to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44956 - 2009-12-21
State v. Windell Carradine
claims that his sentence is unduly harsh. We affirm. Carradine was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11440 - 2005-03-31
claims that his sentence is unduly harsh. We affirm. Carradine was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11440 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing, Newman’s trial counsel testified that his trial strategy was to pursue a self-defense claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410709 - 2021-08-19
hearing, Newman’s trial counsel testified that his trial strategy was to pursue a self-defense claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410709 - 2021-08-19