Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21591 - 21600 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 21591 - 21600 of 83344 for case search.
James R. Koby v. La Crosse County Circuit Court
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4966 - 2005-03-31
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4966 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Melissa Garcia v. Duaine C. Stillman
the “witnesses” under oath. The procedural history of this case is undisputed. Pro se, the Garcias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10686 - 2017-09-20
the “witnesses” under oath. The procedural history of this case is undisputed. Pro se, the Garcias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10686 - 2017-09-20
State v. Leporld L. Miller
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8511 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James R. Koby v. La Crosse County Circuit Court
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4966 - 2017-09-19
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4966 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13369 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13369 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13367 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13367 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
operated his vehicle normally. The court denied Fuller’s motion, stating: [I]t is a close case but I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30593 - 2014-09-15
operated his vehicle normally. The court denied Fuller’s motion, stating: [I]t is a close case but I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30593 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13368 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13368 - 2017-09-21
Patricia L. Guy v. Golden Gate Funeral Home
. Guy appeals pro se from an order dismissing her case against Golden Gate Funeral Home, Maudie Love
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7553 - 2005-03-31
. Guy appeals pro se from an order dismissing her case against Golden Gate Funeral Home, Maudie Love
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7553 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13370 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13370 - 2017-09-21