Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21591 - 21600 of 59049 for quit claim deed.

COURT OF APPEALS
reckless injury and an order denying in part his postconviction motion for relief. He claims that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91473 - 2013-01-09

State v. Robert D. Bates
postconviction claims into his or her original, supplemental, or amended motion. If a criminal defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7350 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by not raising these issues in his motion to suppress. A litigant who fails to raise a claim to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=469695 - 2022-01-11

[PDF] U.S. Paper Converters, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. USPC claims that the circuit court applied an incorrect standard of review to LIRC's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11126 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
claimed to have newly-discovered evidence that his cousin, Floyd Lindell Smith, committed the robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64048 - 2011-05-16

State v. One 19__ Harley Davidson FLH Motorcycle
claims the trial court erred in ordering the forfeiture because the motorcycle had a proper Vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11428 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Donavin Hemphill
motion. Hemphill claims that the admission of a statement made to police who arrived at the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19482 - 2017-09-21

State v. Clayton T. Veldt
collateral attack on his second offense. Specifically, he claims that the State had to prove, as an element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5357 - 2005-03-31

Gregory C. Royal v. Sara Seehafer
. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Gregory C. Royal appeals the dismissal of his small claims defamation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3203 - 2005-03-31

State v. Patricia A.M.
pursuant to § 48.415(7), STATS. She claims the statute is unconstitutional because it violates her rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12557 - 2005-03-31