Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21591 - 21600 of 63531 for records/1000.
Search results 21591 - 21600 of 63531 for records/1000.
State v. Jerry W. Krueger
officer. The court determined that based upon the record evidence and the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15755 - 2005-03-31
officer. The court determined that based upon the record evidence and the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15755 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and response and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134595 - 2015-02-10
consideration of the no-merit report and response and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134595 - 2015-02-10
[PDF]
Bank One v. Geneva SVS, Inc.
, Bank One filed and recorded its first lis pendens describing the property affected by the foreclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5807 - 2017-09-19
, Bank One filed and recorded its first lis pendens describing the property affected by the foreclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5807 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Rickey V. Gray
on the record the factors warranting the restraints. However, we conclude that the court’s erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5459 - 2017-09-19
on the record the factors warranting the restraints. However, we conclude that the court’s erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5459 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778472 - 2024-03-26
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778472 - 2024-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
in the jury instructions and so instructed the jury, and in looking at the entirety of the record and the part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69194 - 2011-08-03
in the jury instructions and so instructed the jury, and in looking at the entirety of the record and the part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69194 - 2011-08-03
COURT OF APPEALS
do not constitute a new factor here. The record shows that the sentencing court discussed Massey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100417 - 2013-08-05
do not constitute a new factor here. The record shows that the sentencing court discussed Massey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100417 - 2013-08-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplement addressing Alexander’s additional claims. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105608 - 2017-09-21
a supplement addressing Alexander’s additional claims. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105608 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. For that matter, the State cites nothing in the record explaining how or why the October 2013 plea hearing date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192405 - 2017-09-21
. For that matter, the State cites nothing in the record explaining how or why the October 2013 plea hearing date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192405 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 22, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, 2003, the Rubenzers commenced this action against Mensch alleging that Mensch was the record owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27146 - 2006-11-21
, 2003, the Rubenzers commenced this action against Mensch alleging that Mensch was the record owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27146 - 2006-11-21