Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21591 - 21600 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 21591 - 21600 of 58340 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court should have given the breach-of-contract question to the jury, we once more reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59543 - 2011-02-01
that the trial court should have given the breach-of-contract question to the jury, we once more reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59543 - 2011-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2012AP1546-CR 2012AP1547-CR 2 After a jury trial, Hall was found guilty of one count of first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103641 - 2017-09-21
. 2012AP1546-CR 2012AP1547-CR 2 After a jury trial, Hall was found guilty of one count of first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103641 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph W. Marola
Marola challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress certain items of physical evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13433 - 2017-09-21
Marola challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress certain items of physical evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13433 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
claim seeking rescission of the contract. Jamstep argues in this appeal that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38744 - 2014-09-15
claim seeking rescission of the contract. Jamstep argues in this appeal that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38744 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Bank One v. Christian C. Ofojebe
contends that the trial court erred because Bank One’s complaint did not comply with the pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18332 - 2017-09-21
contends that the trial court erred because Bank One’s complaint did not comply with the pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18332 - 2017-09-21
State v. Stanley Soward
) (1999-2000).[1] Soward argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2834 - 2005-03-31
) (1999-2000).[1] Soward argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Brash, JJ. Breoen Tyree Cotton appeals a postconviction order. The only issue is whether the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168858 - 2017-09-21
and Brash, JJ. Breoen Tyree Cotton appeals a postconviction order. The only issue is whether the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168858 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at trial because the initial text messages regarding Pascal’s and Owusu’s exchange over the oven door
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956841 - 2025-05-20
at trial because the initial text messages regarding Pascal’s and Owusu’s exchange over the oven door
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956841 - 2025-05-20
State v. George F. Savage
contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress,[3] claiming that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2968 - 2005-03-31
contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress,[3] claiming that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2968 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jesse S.
guidance in meeting court-ordered conditions, and that the trial court erred by concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12382 - 2017-09-21
guidance in meeting court-ordered conditions, and that the trial court erred by concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12382 - 2017-09-21