Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2161 - 2170 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 2161 - 2170 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Douglas A. Edmonston
recommendation. The joint disposition included thirty days in the county jail on the criminal damage to property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15798 - 2005-03-31
recommendation. The joint disposition included thirty days in the county jail on the criminal damage to property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15798 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas A. Edmonston
The joint disposition included thirty days in the county jail on the criminal damage to property count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15798 - 2017-09-21
The joint disposition included thirty days in the county jail on the criminal damage to property count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15798 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a joint Sentence recommendation of 10 days jail (2 days credit) and a $100 fine + court costs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170560 - 2017-09-21
a joint Sentence recommendation of 10 days jail (2 days credit) and a $100 fine + court costs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170560 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion for sentence credit; (2) an order dated May 2, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27382 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for sentence credit; (2) an order dated May 2, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27382 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Pamela Sue Sieben v. Bruce Raymond Sieben
, JOINT-PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. BRUCE RAYMOND SIEBEN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12442 - 2017-09-21
, JOINT-PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. BRUCE RAYMOND SIEBEN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12442 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
a motion for sentence credit for 330 days, the length of time he spent in custody from the date of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26971 - 2006-10-31
a motion for sentence credit for 330 days, the length of time he spent in custody from the date of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26971 - 2006-10-31
[PDF]
Robert S. Schroeder v. Vicki L. Schroeder
the gifted money in a joint account, Vicki intended to donate half of the account to him. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8896 - 2017-09-19
the gifted money in a joint account, Vicki intended to donate half of the account to him. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8896 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
the motion to suppress because Lonkoski was not in custody when he asked for an attorney, and therefore
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95267 - 2013-04-08
the motion to suppress because Lonkoski was not in custody when he asked for an attorney, and therefore
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95267 - 2013-04-08
[PDF]
WI 30
the motion to suppress, focusing its analysis on the fact that Lonkoski was not in custody when he stated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95267 - 2014-09-15
the motion to suppress, focusing its analysis on the fact that Lonkoski was not in custody when he stated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95267 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Throndson understood the maximum penalties for each offense and that the court was not bound by the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391355 - 2021-07-15
that Throndson understood the maximum penalties for each offense and that the court was not bound by the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391355 - 2021-07-15