Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2161 - 2170 of 59264 for quit claim deed.
Search results 2161 - 2170 of 59264 for quit claim deed.
State v. Patrick Chambers
and disorderly conduct. His sole claim is that the trial court erred when it failed to declare a mistrial after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9250 - 2005-03-31
and disorderly conduct. His sole claim is that the trial court erred when it failed to declare a mistrial after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9250 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was whether the conduct was intentional and contemptuous. Cape contended that it was not. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63801 - 2011-05-10
was whether the conduct was intentional and contemptuous. Cape contended that it was not. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63801 - 2011-05-10
[PDF]
State v. Patrick Chambers
sole claim is that the trial court erred when it failed to declare a mistrial after two separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9250 - 2017-09-19
sole claim is that the trial court erred when it failed to declare a mistrial after two separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9250 - 2017-09-19
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Linda Belton
was quite different from the one before us. The pleading in Lewis was a civil complaint for “replevin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11729 - 2005-03-31
was quite different from the one before us. The pleading in Lewis was a civil complaint for “replevin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11729 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven Curtes
claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of an intoxilyzer test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11784 - 2017-09-20
claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of an intoxilyzer test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11784 - 2017-09-20
State v. Steven Curtes
the influence of an intoxicant, contrary to §§ 346.63(1)(a) and 346.65(2), Stats. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11784 - 2005-03-31
the influence of an intoxicant, contrary to §§ 346.63(1)(a) and 346.65(2), Stats. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11784 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
July 2, 2010
? Did the petitioner fail to exhaust his administrative remedies concerning his claim that he
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51775 - 2014-09-15
? Did the petitioner fail to exhaust his administrative remedies concerning his claim that he
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51775 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
July 15, 2010
? Did the petitioner fail to exhaust his administrative remedies concerning his claim that he
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52269 - 2014-09-15
? Did the petitioner fail to exhaust his administrative remedies concerning his claim that he
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52269 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases: added the decisions in 2008AP697-CR, 2008AP1144 and 2008AP1703
? Did the petitioner fail to exhaust his administrative remedies concerning his claim that he
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52499 - 2014-09-15
? Did the petitioner fail to exhaust his administrative remedies concerning his claim that he
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52499 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases: Added the decisions in 2007AP477, 2007AP1253, 2007AP1868 and 2008AP787
? Did the petitioner fail to exhaust his administrative remedies concerning his claim that he
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51419 - 2014-09-15
? Did the petitioner fail to exhaust his administrative remedies concerning his claim that he
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51419 - 2014-09-15