Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2161 - 2170 of 21731 for warrants.
Search results 2161 - 2170 of 21731 for warrants.
COURT OF APPEALS
beyond his presumptive mandatory release date is a new factor warranting relief from his sentence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15
beyond his presumptive mandatory release date is a new factor warranting relief from his sentence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15
[PDF]
Paul Steven Screnock v. Malyn Screnock
there has been a substantial change of circumstances sufficient to warrant the modification of maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13895 - 2014-09-15
there has been a substantial change of circumstances sufficient to warrant the modification of maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13895 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jonathan R. Torres
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because they lack merit and did not warrant an evidentiary hearing or discussion by this court.4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459300 - 2021-12-09
because they lack merit and did not warrant an evidentiary hearing or discussion by this court.4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459300 - 2021-12-09
State v. John Edward Kraemer
for mistrial, concluding the questioning was not significant enough to warrant a mistrial. Kraemer declined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
for mistrial, concluding the questioning was not significant enough to warrant a mistrial. Kraemer declined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
State v. Jonathon R. Torres
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6100 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6100 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard T. Wittrock
to warrant a hearing. Wittrock appeals. ¶4 The circuit court has the discretion to deny a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17635 - 2017-09-21
to warrant a hearing. Wittrock appeals. ¶4 The circuit court has the discretion to deny a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17635 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S.] at 21. These facts must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27127 - 2006-11-13
inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S.] at 21. These facts must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27127 - 2006-11-13
Robert W. Probst v. Peter Chen
the contract warranted the scanner was made in 1999 and that the tube was not more than eight months old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6851 - 2005-03-31
the contract warranted the scanner was made in 1999 and that the tube was not more than eight months old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6851 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Karen A. Lloyd v. Daniel J. Lloyd
and the best interests of the children warranted a change in periods of physical placement. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14627 - 2017-09-21
and the best interests of the children warranted a change in periods of physical placement. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14627 - 2017-09-21