Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21601 - 21610 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 21601 - 21610 of 69399 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Elliott argues that he was illegally seized. We affirm as Elliott’s encounter with the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=200443 - 2017-11-08
Elliott argues that he was illegally seized. We affirm as Elliott’s encounter with the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=200443 - 2017-11-08
[PDF]
State v. Anthony P. Robinson
to twenty years in prison. He also appeals an order denying his motion to modify the sentence. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14123 - 2014-09-15
to twenty years in prison. He also appeals an order denying his motion to modify the sentence. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14123 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in an alley, approaching from the front, in the late hours of April 18, 2017. He paused in the headlights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677332 - 2023-07-11
in an alley, approaching from the front, in the late hours of April 18, 2017. He paused in the headlights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677332 - 2023-07-11
CA Blank Order
notified the parties that upon reading the PSI, he realized he was familiar with the mother of Taylor’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101775 - 2013-09-09
notified the parties that upon reading the PSI, he realized he was familiar with the mother of Taylor’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101775 - 2013-09-09
Frontsheet
persons in trust; and falsely certifying to the State Bar of Wisconsin that he was in compliance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30379 - 2007-09-24
persons in trust; and falsely certifying to the State Bar of Wisconsin that he was in compliance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30379 - 2007-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) (2011-12). 1 On appeal, Burkart argues that he is entitled to sentence modification based on a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105185 - 2017-09-21
) (2011-12). 1 On appeal, Burkart argues that he is entitled to sentence modification based on a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105185 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and advised of his right to file a response, but he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332998 - 2021-02-09
of the no-merit report and advised of his right to file a response, but he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332998 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in possession of a firearm. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. House
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175367 - 2017-09-21
in possession of a firearm. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. House
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175367 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imprisonment, as well as an order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Koll argues that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114318 - 2017-09-21
imprisonment, as well as an order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Koll argues that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114318 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
as an order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Koll argues that he was denied the effective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114318 - 2014-06-09
as an order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Koll argues that he was denied the effective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114318 - 2014-06-09